Fancy.Prose.Style.

I'm Slaney Chadwick Ross.

Thu Aug 27
Christians who believe in the sanctity of life ought to be concerned about any health care system overhaul that will increase abortions. But our conviction about life should also lead us to care about the 45 million Americans who lack health insurance and therefore receive inadequate care. We should care that the uninsured are 1.6 times more likely to die from cancer than those with insurance who are diagnosed and treated earlier. We should care that we have a system that discriminates against those with preexisting conditions, the weakest and most vulnerable in our society. Our belief in the value of life should drive us to seek a system that will care for our brothers and sisters after they are born and not just before.

Skye Jethani (via azspot)

I’m also not clear on why anybody thinks that universal coverage would increase the number of abortions. Women opt for abortion are increasingly young and poor. Is this a lack of access to affordable birth control? A lack of access to sufficient prenatal care? A concern about the costs of childbirth? Universal coverage would fix all of these.

Edit: Catbus has some numbers

For what it’s worth, Guttmacher casts the number of people who abort for financial reasons at 73%, with 28% (of the total population, not the 73% population) specifcally saying ‘can’t afford a baby and childcare, which is probably about as close to the financial concerns listed above as you’re likely to find without a specialized survey.

People think this will increase the number of abortions for two reasons, mostly: a) not aware of the Hyde Amendment; b) consider contraceptive use to be abortion. Mark it.

(via squashed)

 I’ve lost count of the “Christians” I’ve met who are virulently anti-abortion but who, when it comes to healthcare, adopt the laissez-fair “every man for himself” attitude (oddly similar to the Darwinism they pretend doesn’t exist).

Sun Aug 23
Fri Aug 21
Thu Aug 20

txtsfrmlstnght:

(845): First thing I heard on the radio when I got in the car: “humans and dinosaurs used to live happily together”… I need to stop listening to Christian radio…


Tue Aug 18

On Those "Entitled" Twenty-Somethings

squashed:

Apparently people in their 20s are a bunch of entitled whiners. I also hear we’re afraid of hard work. I’m rather sick of hearing it. Of course we have a sense of entitlement—we had an understanding with the older generation. We followed through with our half of the deal. What happened?

The word “entitlement” has picked up a negative connotation it shouldn’t have. If you go to the bank and deposit $20, you are entitled to get your $20 from the bank. If you fulfill your half of a contract, you are entitled to the other party’s performance. Sure, its a problem when you feel you deserve something you don’t deserve—but there is nothing wrong with acknowledging a legitimate debt. So let’s ask why some people in their 20s might feel the older generation hasn’t kept its end of the bargain. Let’s talk a bit about generational justice.

Our parents told us a number of things. Stay in school. Study hard. Stay off drugs. Keep your grades up. Get into the best college there is. Be the best at everything you do. Learn. Research. Excel. For me, the all-nighters doing homework started in seventh grade. School followed by extra-curriculars would start a bit before 8:00 in the morning and, for some parts of the year, could run until 9:00 or 10:00 at night. Then I started studying. Through college, commitments might go until well after midnight. Do all of this now, we were told, and when you finally graduate there will be a job for you. It may not be easy. Nobody is handing anything to you on a silver platter and you might get some dirt under your fingernails. But we had an understanding. There is, we are told, a rational system, and if we are smart enough and work hard enough, things will turn out okay. Will you achieve all of your dreams? Realistically, maybe not—but you should at least be comfortable. So what happens after graduation?

Congratulations, graduate! Go out and take on the world. What? No job? Surely you applied? You interviewed? Maybe you’re being unrealistic. Have you considered temp agencies? Retail? They’re flooded as well? Have you called? Dropped in in person? Pounded the proverbial pavement? Have you tried working your network? Is that really a stack of a hundred rejection letters? You must be doing something wrong.

For those who just graduated, there was no job. That’s not technically true. There was a job—but somebody older has it and isn’t letting go. It turns out the whole system is rigged. Education and intelligence and everything we were told was important turn out to be worth nothing next to seniority and experience.

Maybe the system was relatively fair twenty or thirty years ago—but it certainly isn’t now. Maybe there was a time, relatively recently, when young job seekers could weigh different offers or meaningfully negotiate salaries. When things got tough, that was the first thing to go. As the economy contracts there is a larger and larger focus on protecting people who already have jobs—or those who have recently lost them. Extending unemployment benefits won’t help recent graduates. In today’s economy, seniority is more important than merit. And through all of this, the wealth gap keeps expanding.

Sure, the economy is tough. Nobody meant for this to happen. People screwed up. Accidents happen. Normally, if you bungle something up and can’t fulfill your end of a bargain, you would and try to make it right. You broke it? Fix it. Or at least look embarrassed. That hasn’t happened. I turns out, we’re just whiners. We did everything that was asked of us … and when the older generations don’t deliver their half of the bargain, it’s somehow our fault.

Take health insurance. Decades of pressure to lower wages for new hires and cut benefits means that the employer-provided system means that even if you can find a job, it probably won’t offer health insurance. Paying for insurance out of pocket is prohibitively expensive if you’re healthy and coverage is entirely unavailable if you’re not. And if you have a minimum-wage job serving coffee, you’re still getting a chunk taken out of your paycheck to finance a program that won’t be solvent by the time you’re old enough to use it. But any effort to change this system is met with seniors screaming about communists taking away their medicare. And if 20-somethings back a legislative initiative that would help them obtain coverage, they’re slackers living in their parents basements. And let’s not even get into the individual mandate in the health-reform bill that will require the healthy and young to subsidize the healthcare of their older and generally wealthier parents.

Should twenty-somethings who have done everything asked of them their entire lives feel like somebody pulled one over on them? Probably—but bad things happen. And hopefully all those years of education taught us enough empathy not to be vindictive. Call us gullible—but don’t call us lazy or selfish.  If some of us push for a few reforms that could help us succeed even when our parents have dropped the ball—back them, and be thankful that we’re not talking outright revolution.

But most of all, don’t blame the twenty-somethings for their dissatisfaction. When some asshole like Reuben Navarette writes, “We already knew they had a sense of entitlement from the narcissism they exhibit,” I can only think of one response:

Fuck you.

Thu Aug 13
Tue Aug 11

There are people who like The Catcher in the Rye who don’t like Adrian Mole and I just don’t get it.

Wed Aug 5
oldhollywood:

Stills from Alice in Wonderland (1903, dir. Cecil Hepworth, starring May Clark), the first filmed version of Lewis Carroll’s tale. When it was first released in 1903, it was a then astonishing 12 minutes long. Unfortunately, the film was not well preserved and only about 8 minutes of it remain (somewhat) intact. 
The film can be seen here.

oldhollywood:

Stills from Alice in Wonderland (1903, dir. Cecil Hepworth, starring May Clark), the first filmed version of Lewis Carroll’s tale. When it was first released in 1903, it was a then astonishing 12 minutes long. Unfortunately, the film was not well preserved and only about 8 minutes of it remain (somewhat) intact. 

The film can be seen here.

Mon Aug 3

Ooo la la, my name is mentioned in the New Yorker

thefamouschronicles:

A quick mention of Babes in Toyland here. Scroll down to the “Ice Factory Festival” Entry.

Can someone scan this for me? I *shame* don’t have a subscription. I’m too busy reading my free issues of Cosmo, Glamour, Marie Claire, Oprah Magazine, National Geographic, OK! and my paid issues of TONY, Us Weekly, New York Magazine, and Real Simple.

 Horray for Von Hottie!  (I’m not sure if my creaky old printer can still handle scans, but I’ll give it a go when my next issue comes).

Sun Aug 2
gatsbylives:

booklover:

tweexcore:
Florentijn Hofman, brilliant.

 Trojan rabbit?

 For Dave.

gatsbylives:

booklover:

tweexcore:

Florentijn Hofman, brilliant.

 Trojan rabbit?

 For Dave.